Medtrics was created to be flexible and to change with the needs of the medical education community.
Edgar Poe | Director Michigan State University
If you’re working on an older Residency program system, you’re probably pulling your hair out in frustration right now. Legacy systems were conceived for organizations with little to no change. No one really likes legacy systems, but there was a time and place for them. While we all know that these systems can be difficult to work with, they can actually do real damage to a company’s operations.
Medical education has changed a lot in the past few years with accrediting organizations becoming more data and outcomes driven. Many hospitals and universities have implemented agile solutions to address these evolving needs, but this begs the question:
Why are many organizations still using legacy systems?
A legacy system follows a waterfall plan. It deals with change in big pieces, followed by a long period of stagnation. Decades ago, this was virtually every organization’s plan for success. Now, health systems and universities move at a fast pace and need agility to adapt to the continuous change and uncertainty that lies ahead. This agile strategy is well-suited for data-oriented and regulatory changes with accreditation, and it’s the reason many organizations have adopted them.
Preview of pages 5 & 6
Have any questions about updating your organization’s legacy system? Medtrics specializes in contemporary solutions for healthcare education/accreditation management and can help your organization transition to a modern platform. Contact us for more information.
Legacy Software Can Threaten Your Operations & Interactions.
Legacy systems typically support users for a brief period, but organizational needs and requirements quickly evolve beyond what these systems can handle. When requirements of the accreditation and internal processes evolve, but the system does not, users are forced to leverage outside tools to conduct their operations as usual.
This can cause issues in many areas of an organization including on-boarding, training, getting evaluations, and keeping an engaged team. Organizations forced into this due to a faulty system are likely to struggle in these areas. This not only hurts the processes of the organization, but it can negatively impact the reputation and accreditation of the organization.
Preview of pages 7 & 8
Submit the form at the top of the page to receive a downloadable PDF. Filling out this form allows Medtrics to contact you via email.
Discover how Michigan State University College of Osteopathic Medicine partnered with Medtrics to pilot an AI-assisted process that improved efficiency and accuracy in MSPE compilation while preserving student voice, evaluator intent, and institutional oversight
73% of program directors say accreditation takes time away from teaching. This guide helps your team spot inefficiencies, uncover gaps in compliance, and build a shared understanding of what an accreditation-ready system should do—before you invest time in demos or vendor conversations.
9/12/2024
In an engaging and practical webinar, Natasha Brocks, owner of GME Admin Insights, teamed up with Medtrics to provide invaluable insights into managing evaluations in Graduate Medical Education (GME). Natasha’s 18+ years of experience in GME helped guide attendees through the complexities of evaluation processes, offering strategies to improve compliance, streamline workflows, and ensure the success of residency programs. Designed for GME coordinators and administrators, this session showcased how evaluation management can shape the future of medical education.